The Weird And Wonderful
Part 1: A Brief Look at Flying Engine Test Beds
Before the Concorde first kissed the edges of the stratosphere, before the Trent XWB spun up its first tonne of thrust, and before the F-35 dove headlong into combat, something else flew first, onboard an aircraft much stranger, bristling with sensors, gauges, and institutional optimism, stitched together from spare parts, patched with telemetry wires, weighed down with test gear. These aircraft carry neither passengers nor bombs, but instead unimaginable volumes of data that are collected in real time flight, fed through spools of fibre-optic cable to engineers hunched behind glowing screens, squinting through turbulence. These are aircraft that one never sees on posters or postage stamps. They are unphotogenic by design, often unloved by the public and get rarely mentioned in press releases, yet without them, no modern jetliner nor cutting-edge fighter would ever get off the drawing board.
These are flying testbeds, Frankenplanes that make up a ghost fleet of airborne laboratories that are key to aerospace innovation. Some are elegant airliners that have been modified with bulbous noses and mismatched engine nacelles, poxed with radomes, strange pods, sensor fairings, or cockpit windows they were never meant to have. Others are lumbering post war bombers that were given a second life with science stitched into their ribs, carrying engineers and racks of computers instead of ordnance. A rare handful carry the gutted remains of another aircraft embedded onto them, perhaps a cockpit grafted onto a tail or a nose swallowed by a fuselage. All of them exist to fly what hasn't yet been proven, to fail safely so that others may soar.
For over eight decades, these aircraft have played the role of a midwife to every leap in aviation. From post-war jet engines that needed space to flame out safely, to the sensor-fusion brains of sixth-generation fighters, to the whisper-quiet hydrogen turbines of tomorrow, every innovation had to be tested somewhere, and somehow, in the air. They are the invisible edge of national aviation power, though less glamorous than fighters and less iconic than bombers, they are more vital than either as they allow countries to test sensors before they are seen, engines before they roar, and systems before they save or take lives. They are, in their own quiet way, the keepers of sovereign flight. In this two part series, I would like to take a global tour of these strange birds, from Britain’s engine-testing Vulcans to GE’s mutant 747s, from India’s humble HS-748 to Russia’s grotesque Tu-214LMK, and even a bizarre Iranian Tu-154 with a fighter jet bolted to its tail, it is time to explore the weird, wonderful, and wildly critical aircraft that test the limits of what’s possible, so that others may fly beyond them.
Bomb bays & Jetways: Origins of Engine Testbeds
The jet age didn’t begin with a clean sheet, as even before WWII, engineers realised that propeller efficiency limited the advancement of conventional prop-driven engines. As the war dragged on, British and German engineers needed a way to trial a wholly new kind of propulsion safely at speed and at altitude. The solution was to employ the wartime bomber, a brutish yet proven platform with a forgiving airframe and a surplus status that made it expendable. In the late 1940s and early 50s, some of the most important jet engines in aviation history were first in aircraft built to drop death from 20,000ft. Bombers not only had the range and space, but also had critical redundancy as they employed multiple engines, meaning if the test powerplant failed, the others could reliably bring the plane home. They had room for test engineers, racks of monitoring gear, and bundles of copper wiring feeding real-time readings back to onboard analysts. In short, they were sacrificial giants, repurposed from war to peacetime trial by fire. This was a period when nations were flush with heavy bombers that were becoming obsolete as frontline assets but were still mechanically reliable. So rather than scrap them, they were reborn into laboratories with wings, taking on a second life not as destroyers, but as creators.
Wellingtons, Lancasters & Lincolns: From Bombing Runs to Bench Tests
The first British turbojet was the Rolls-Royce RB.23 Welland (designed by Sir Frank Whittle in 1941) and saw its use in the iconic Gloster Meteor making it the first jet (and only) powered fighter operated by the Allies in WWII. Starting in April 1942, a group of three Vickers Wellingtons were modified to house the new engines in their tails, with their crews remarking how quiet and smooth the aircraft was when the twin Merlin engines were idled and the bomber ran with the jet engine operating alone. Then came the Avro Lancaster, famous for bouncing bombs into Ruhr Valley dams, with its sturdy frame, spacious bomb bay, and four piston engines making it ideal to test out Rolls-Royce’s next generation of turbojets. These weren’t aesthetic integrations as the Lancasters had them replace the outer Merlins entirely with engines like the Rolls-Royce Derwent and the Nene, creating a lopsided configuration that looked wrong but flew astonishingly well, allowing engineers to monitor real-time engine performance in the sky.
The Swedes too got their hands on one, they modified an Avro Lancaster in the 1950s and designated it as the Tp 80 to test out locally developped engines like the STAL Dovern, which was installed underneath in a nacelle faired-in to the Lancaster's bomb bay. However after just 130 hours of flight testing, the Dovern programme was cancelled in favour of licesnse production of the Rolls-Royce Avon. The Tp 80 Lancaster would later be called in use again to test out Swedish designed afterburners for Rolls-Royce’s Avon to be used in the Saab J32 Lansen and J35 Draken fighters.
In the mid 1950s, the Lancaster’s younger sibling, the Avro Lincoln, took on the mantle as a flying testbed for various gas turbine engines. With added room and range, the bomber became a flying forge for turboprops like the Armstrong Siddeley Python, Bristol Proteus, and the Bristol Theseus, as well as early turbojets like the Rolls-Royce Avon and Tay, engines that would later power civilian aircraft like the de Havilland Comet and military jets like the English Electric Canberra. Every high-altitude test flight produced reams of telemetry: spool times, flameout behaviour, vibration harmonics, fuel delivery anomalies, data that is impossible to simulate on the ground at the time.
Giants with Jet Dreams: America’s Early Testbeds
The British were not alone in resurrecting bombers for propulsion science. In the US, engineers turned to equally massive, and often more eccentric platforms such as the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, Consolidated B-24 Liberator, Boeing B-50 superfortress, and the Convair B-36 Peacemaker. These aircraft carried experimental jet engines like the Westinghouse J34, General Electric J47, Pratt & Whitney J57 and J79, powerplants that were destined to define American airpower in the 1950s and 60s. The test engines were usually mounted in underwing pods or belly racks, far from the fuselage to minimise risk. In some cases, such as with the B-36, engines were placed inside the bomb bay itself, with air intake scoops carved into the fuselage and exhaust redirected via long ducts. The world’s largest piston bomber became a crucible for jet propulsion, carrying the very engines that would one day power the F-86 Sabre, the B-52 Stratofortress, and the first generation of American jetliners.
And then there were the nuclear dreams. Not content with jet engines alone, the USAF briefly considered an aircraft that could stay airborne indefinitely. To test this nuclear powered aircraft, the B-36 was modified to accomodate a 3MW nuclear reactor in its bomb bay, designated the NB-36H, its purpose wasn’t to provide propulsion but instead to analyse the effect of radiation on aircraft systems, with its results feeding into the Convair X-6 programme that aimed to have a flying nulcear powered bomber for the USAF, but it was cancelled in 1961 due to the risks of contamination should a combat incident force the aircraft to the ground.
The Avro Vulcan & the Supersonic Gamble
By the 1960s, the bomber-turned-testbed trend reached its most elegant form with the Avro Vulcan, a Cold War delta-wing nuclear platform, more spaceship than aircraft in silhouette. One Vulcan in particular, XA903, became the airborne womb for one of the most ambitious engines in aviation history: the Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593. Slung beneath the Vulcan’s wing in a nacelle the size of a railway carriage, the engine looked completely out of place akin to a tumour on a bird of prey. But what it carried was revolutionary, as the Olympus 593 would go on to power Concorde past Mach 2. First, though, it had to prove itself in the Vulcan’s capable arms, tested at altitude, in afterburner mode, through repeated transonic transitions, monitored and nursed by engineers onboard. That same airframe, designed to carry Britain’s nuclear deterrent, ended up carrying the world’s most iconic civilian supersonic engine to maturity.
But XA903 was not alone in this strange duty. XA894, another Vulcan, served as a flying forge for a different Olympus: the 22R, a version with bifurcated air intakes developed for the ill-fated TSR-2, Britain’s most ambitious and equally controversial supersonic strike aircraft. Where the 593 sought to break records at Mach 2 in peacetime, the 22R was built for war, designed to scream in low and fast, dodging radar and punching through Soviet airspace. The Vulcan thus bridged two dreams: Concorde’s silver swan and TSR-2’s white ghost, in each case, the engines soared first aboard a bomber from a bygone era, repurposed not to drop payloads, but to cradle potential.
The Jumbo Age: Modern Engine Testbeds
As jet engines grew fatter, smarter, and more complex, the testbeds they rode aloft on had to evolve with them. With engines the size of buses, intake fans wide enough to swallow a Fiat 500 and torque forces capable of twisting a fuselage into pretzels, the days of hanging a modest turbojet under a bomber wing were very much over. The bombers of old, noble as they were, just simply couldn’t keep up, and so, the testbed scaled up from the Lancaster to the Jumbo Jet. The very aircraft that once redefined global air travel would now become the crucible for propulsion’s next frontier. The testbeds of the 21st century would not be hacked together in hangars, but purpose-designed in aerospace labs, built to carry tomorrow’s engines into the sky today. The age of jumbo testbeds marks a turning point in aerospace development, from improvisation to intention. These aren’t leftover warplanes given one last job, but are instead precision-crafted, sensor-soaked flying laboratories, designed from the start to test the technologies that tomorrow's world depends on.
Rolls-Royce – Boeing 747-200 (N787RR)
At first glance, N787RR looks like a pensioned-off airliner, with the ex-Cathay Pacific airliner painted in a near blank white livery, understated to the point of invisibility that is destined to be retired to some desolate tarmac. But appearances deceive as the heavily modified 747-200, reinforced with custom bracing, specialised wiring, telemetry racks, and a bespoke engine pylon replacing the No. 2 engine on the left wing serves as the venerable British engine manufacturer’s flying testbed. Based in Arizona, the aircraft has flown virtually the entire Trent family, Trent 800s, 900s, 1000s, the XWB, and now serves as the likely launch platform for the upcoming UltraFan. Each configuration gives the aircraft a new asymmetric grin, as one nacelle bulges comically larger than the others, bearing the weight, and risk, of a next-generation powerplant. Its latest configuration setup is a Frankenstein's delight: a Pearl 10X turbofan (destined for the Dassault Falcon 10X), a Trent 1000, and three legacy RB211s humming along as workhorses. Every flight gathers thousands of variables, from thermal envelope behaviour and spool-up harmonics to bleed air dynamics and icing limits, this is data that no wind tunnel can substitute.
But this is merely the latest chapter in Rolls-Royce’s long history of airborne experimentation. Rewind to the late 1960s, when the company, newly unified as Britain’s sole engine maker, began developing the RB211, the world’s first production high-bypass turbofan with wide-chord fan blades. It was a revolution in thrust, fuel efficiency, and noise reduction, but at the time, there were few airframes large or robust enough to host the enormous engine. So, with government intervention, the RAF lent Rolls-Royce a Vickers VC10, one of Britain’s finest long-range jetliners, whose entire left-side engine nacelle assembly comprising of two Rolls-Royce Conways, their mounts, plumbing, and fairings, was removed and replaced with a single, snarling RB211. The aircraft became an asymmetrical oddity, but one of monumental importance. The flight trials proved not only viable, but transformative and the RB211 became the launch engine for the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, and later went on to power 747s, 757s, and was eventually reborn as the Trent series, becoming the crown jewel of modern Rolls-Royce propulsion. This VC10 was supposed to be restored and returned to RAF service, but that never materialised as reassembling it proved too costly, and the aircraft was quietly scrapped, a noble end for a noble machine that midwifed one of the world’s most iconic engine families. More recently, Rolls-Royce has acquired another 747 for the future: an ex-Qantas 747-400 (now registered N747RR), currently undergoing conversion to join the test fleet.
General Electric – The Flying Forges
Over the decades, General Electric has operated not one but two Boeing 747s as airborne engine testbeds, each modified to carry prototype engines under real-world flight conditions. The first, a 747-100 (N747GE), was acquired after Pan Am’s bankruptcy and was fitted with extensive structural reinforcements, data systems, and provisions to swap out the #2 engine for test units. It remained powered by its original Pratt & Whitney JT9Ds, as no GE-powered 747s were available at the time. From the massive GE90 to the CFM56, GEnx, LEAP, and Passport, the aircraft has tested 11 engine models and 39 builds in service, stalling, sideslipping, and freezing its way through Mojave skies until retirement in 2018, and is now preserved at the Pima Air & Space Museum. Its successor, the more modern 747-400 (N747GF), entered service in 2010. These airborne thrones have carried some of the most powerful engines ever built, flying not for passengers, but for progress.
Pratt & Whitney Canada – From Beechcrafts to Boeing Behemoths
While Rolls-Royce and GE test titanic turbofans, Pratt & Whitney Canada focuses on the quieter but no less critical world of regional turboprops and business jet engines. Their earliest foray into airborne engine trials began in 1961, when they strapped a prototype PT6A turboprop to the nose of a Beech 3T Expeditor, turning it into a tri-motor curiosity. As powerplants grew in scale and complexity, so too did their platforms as in the 1970s, they tested engines on a Vickers Viscount, followed by stints with a Learjet 36 and a Super King Air 200. When it came time to test their first turbofan, the JT15D, they borrowed a CF-100 Canuck fighter/interceptor from the Royal Canadian Air Force, chosen for its high ground clearance and rugged under-fuselage pylon.
But it wasn’t until the mid-1980s that P&WC made a major leap, acquiring two Boeing 720Bs, quickly becaming pivotal in testing engines like the V2500, destined for the Airbus A320. One of these aircraft, C-FETB, made the last-ever flight of a 720B before being retired to a museum in 2012. Today, P&WC operates two rare Boeing 747SPs, C-FPAW (originally from Air China) and C-GTFF (acquired from Korean Air) that have been extensively modified. In a world of flashy turbofans, they are the unsung artisans, refining the machinery that keeps regional aviation humming.
Honeywell – Boeing 757 (N757HW)
Then there’s Honeywell, whose testbed is arguably one of the most versatile flying labs in the world, a Boeing 757-200 (N757HW) clad in corporate red and white. Unlike Rolls-Royce or P&W, Honeywell isn’t just testing engines, it’s testing avionics, Wi-Fi systems, weather radars, SATCOM units, auxiliary power units, and more. This 757 acts as a flying showcase for the company's sprawling aerospace product line, featuring a distinct third engine mount on the right fuselage, near the rear cargo door, used to test small and mid-sized turbofans like the HTF7000 or TFE731. The cockpit, too, is constantly evolving, often loaded with prototype avionics packages years ahead of commercial release, testing next-gen flight management systems, synthetic vision, and predictive turbulence avoidance tech.
Airbus & Rolls-Royce – The Hydrogen Future, Aboard an A380
While others perfect what we already know, Airbus and Rolls-Royce are preparing for what we don’t yet. As aviation inches towards decarbonisation, the next testbed won’t necessarily be for jet fuel, it may be for hydrogen. Airbus and Rolls-Royce have partnered to create a new kind of flying lab, based on the retired Airbus A380. In this concept, a fifth engine pod, a hydrogen-combustion unit, will be mounted on the upper deck of the fuselage aft of the wing, separate from the main engines for safety. Inside the aircraft, cryogenic tanks will store liquid hydrogen chilled to -253°C, feeding the engine through advanced fuel lines and monitoring systems. Everything about this testbed will be new: fuel dynamics, combustor behaviour, emissions chemistry, thermal envelope controls, even emergency shutoff protocols. If successful, it could rewrite the blueprint for aviation post-2035, and prove once again that the testbed remains where real flight begins.
The Prophets of Propulsion
Before the world could marvel at Mach 2 contrails or whisper-quiet ultra-high bypass fans, someone had to bolt an unproven engine to a proven airframe and see if it would fly, or fail. From Lancasters with lopsided nacelles to 747s grinning with grotesquely oversized turbofans, flying testbeds have been a critical part of every major leap in propulsion technology. These aircraft don’t drop bombs, and they rarely carry passengers, but they do something far more important: they carry risk, doubt, uncertainty, and the terrifying possibility that what works on paper may falter in the sky. In doing so, they give wings to ideas that once seemed impossible.
These Frankenplanes, odd-looking, over-instrumented, and often underappreciated, have helped birth everything from the Concorde to the UltraFan. They have stitched together nations’ industrial confidence, proving engines at altitude before they power fleets across oceans. As the age of kerosene gives way to hydrogen, hybrid-electric, and whatever comes next, their work is only getting harder, and more vital. But not all testbeds chase thrust, some chase signals. Some test sight itself with radars, sensors, brains made of silicon and software. These are the aircraft where perception is forged, where electronic warfare is rehearsed, and where data becomes doctrine. And that’s a story for Part 2…
In depth article